International Psoriasis Council

Advancing Knowledge. Enhancing Care.

Advancing Knowledge. Enhancing Care.

Commentary: Vaccine Hesitancy and Access to Psoriasis Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic

image of commentary-mrowietz
Ulrich Mrowietz, MD
University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein
Kiel, Germany

PUBLICATION

Vaccine Hesitancy and Access to Psoriasis Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from a Global Patient-Reported Cross-Sectional Survey. Cook E, Dand N, Yiu Zenas Zee N, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2022 Feb 1. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21042. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35104366.

Why this article was chosen

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a significant concern, and vaccination has been crucial worldwide in its combat. The IPC has followed the developments around COVID-19, issued several statements, and provided information through expert videos and commentaries. The IPC has supported collecting real-world data on COVID-19 and psoriasis (PsoProtect and PsoProtectMe registries). Recently Cook et al (Br J Dermatol 2022 (online first)) reported on the interruption of psoriasis care during the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine hesitancy in patients with psoriasis.

Commentary

Sudden pandemic situations are a significant threat to people with known chronic illnesses representing an additional unexpected burden. Those with limited psycho-social resources and lower resilience are more likely to withdraw from regular care and seek help or information. However, the high proportion of people with psoriasis having interrupted access to care (40.1%), as described in the report by Cook et al, is unexpected. Still, in this report, the data were collected from a multi-national survey (PsoProtectMe) in 89 countries worldwide on 802 patients with psoriasis. In addition, psoriasis patients having interrupted access to care had increased vaccine hesitancy, were more prevalent in non-white ethnic groups, had shorter disease duration, and were less likely to take systemic immunosuppressants.

It is important to note that the disruption of care can be bi-directional. The affected people stopped seeing their treating physicians, but physicians also canceled patients’ appointments. It is worth noting that younger people with psoriasis and more severe disease were more likely to discontinue care, and the rate of vaccine hesitancy was higher in this group. The authors did not speculate about factors driving this coincident finding. This may be due to greater engagement of younger people through social media, in which worries and concerns (e.g., a new type of vaccine, fear of adverse events, etc) are intensively discussed and amplified without direct physician’s input. However, and encouragingly, the rate of vaccine hesitancy, which was 8.3% in the entire patient population, seems low and provides evidence that stakeholders providing care in the different healthcare systems can get through to people with psoriasis.

As reported by Cook et al, these data help identify groups that need correct and unbiased information based on solid and accurate evidence-based medicine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Categories

Tags

Recent Posts

Expert Insights IPC and IFPA CEO

IFPA and IPC Partnership One Year Later — Joining the Clinical and Patient Perspectives

New Councilor Headshots

Meet Our Newest Councilors

IPC and IFPA strongly advocate that early diagnosis is crucial and must be available for all individuals regardless of race, ethnicity, physical ability, culture, nationality, or geographic location blog graphic

IPC and IFPA Joint Statement on Diversity and Inclusion

Also Read

Commentary -Peter van de Kerkhof headshot
Peter van de Kerkhof

Commentary: Association of Apremilast with Vascular Inflammation and Cardiometabolic Function in Patients with Psoriasis: The VIP-A Phase 4, Open-label, Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Recently, a study was conducted on the effect of apremilast on vascular inflammation and cardiometabolic functions with an impressively comprehensive set of markers for vascular inflammation and cardiometabolic disease. Peter van de Kerkhof, MD, PhD, provides his expert opinion on the overall conclusion and the implications of this study are discussed.

Read More

Subscribe to the IPC Newsletter

Stay up-to-date on the latest research, news, and upcoming events right in your inbox.